Why Democracy Is Best

The value of democracy lies in freedom of expression and leaders who persuade with the power of the pen rather than the sword.

People hold posters during a rally in defense of freedom of speech and journalism in central Moscow on  June 16, 2019.
People hold posters during a rally in defense of freedom of speech and journalism in central Moscow on June 16, 2019. (Photo by YURI KADOBNOV/AFP via Getty Images)

Democracy around the world is in decline. In 2022, according to Freedom House, a nonprofit organization founded in 1941 to defend democracy and freedom worldwide, only one in five individuals globally lived in a country that can be described as “free.” This is an alarming trend, especially when contrasted with the widespread optimism during the 1980s and 1990s about the universal triumph of democratic values. The democratic recession raises important questions about the best form of government. The most consequential of these questions is also the most basic — namely, is democracy still the best form of government? The answer is a resounding “yes,” though not for the typical reasons.

As the Cold War was coming to a close in 1989, an influential argument was made by political scientist Francis Fukuyama about the “end of history.” Fukuyama saw signs of the coming together of two trends. One was the crisis of nonmarket systems for organizing economic activity, such as the central planning practiced in the Soviet Union and in its Eastern European satellites. The other was the movement towards democratization, which had begun with the toppling of dictatorships in Spain and Portugal in the mid-1970s and would soon engulf other countries in Europe, Asia, Africa and Latin America. The 1990s were the heyday of democracy promotion around the world. Markets triumphed and more countries were becoming democratic. It seemed that history had indeed ended.

But the 21st century brought in the painful realization that democracy and the market need not go hand in hand. Two powerful states reemerged on the global scene — China and Russia — which offered examples of successful market economies that resolutely opposed democratization. What is more, the two countries have worked assiduously to export their model of development to autocrats around the world who want prosperity without the risks to stability in office that are presented by multiparty political competition. Today, the global liberal political order is under assault from both autocrats and populists. History appears to be ending again, this time with democracies rather than autocracies being threatened with extinction.

The biggest threat to autocrats like Russia’s Vladimir Putin and populists like Hungary’s Viktor Orbán lies in a vigorous press that can present alternative information challenging their attempts at manipulating the public.

Why is democracy the best form of government? The argument should not rest on economics. Markets appear to work equally well (or equally poorly) in both democracies and autocracies. The true value of democracy lies elsewhere — namely, in the freedom of expression, which allows for ideas to be aired and debated, and for leaders to persuade with the power of the pen rather than the power of the sword. The biggest threat to autocrats like Russia’s Vladimir Putin and populists like Hungary’s Viktor Orbán lies in a vigorous press that can present alternative information challenging their attempts at manipulating the public. Media freedom is nonexistent in autocracies and is under considerable threat even in democracies. To safeguard democratic values, we need to preserve the free press.

Martin K. Dimitrov is a Tulane professor of political science.

Tags